The historical echoes of Nia DaCosta’s film “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple” resonate through various events. They reflect how the first two Europeans to settle in Australia resorted to brutal violence to maintain order, with their leader incentivizing them with the spoils of their victims and the thrill of ritualistic violence. Similarly, in 1941, two individuals claimed divine roles and orchestrated deadly ritualistic acts on Belcher Island during a harsh winter.
In DaCosta’s sequel to the zombie-apocalypse film “28 Years Later,” we witness a disturbing portrayal of how communal systems can be manipulated for violent purposes. “The Bone Temple” presents a graphic depiction of gore, sadism, and religious fanaticism, which may be challenging for many viewers. However, for those who can endure it, the movie offers thrilling action, compelling performances, and a profound exploration of the origins of cruelty and strategies to combat it.
The narrative unfolds in a post-apocalyptic world where survivors are besieged by a “rage virus,” turning some into cannibalistic beings. The story focuses on a group led by the charismatic cult leader Sir Jimmy Crystal, who enforces brutality in the name of “Old Nick.” The film delves into themes of regret, terror, and desperation through the lens of different characters, including Dr. Kelson and Samson, a towering zombie.
The film subverts traditional hero narratives and delves into the complexities of human behavior under extreme circumstances. It challenges the notion of chosen saviors and explores how narratives can fuel violence. “The Bone Temple” offers a bleak yet thought-provoking commentary on human nature and the potential for resistance against oppressive systems without sacrificing one’s humanity.
Despite its dark tone, the film presents a compelling message about resilience and the dangers of blindly following destructive ideologies. Through its portrayal of screaming zombies and harrowing scenarios, “The Bone Temple” prompts viewers to reflect on the fragile balance between survival and morality in a tumultuous world.